JAMB 2025: THE POLITICS OF NUMBERS AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF RANKING
By: Fr. Okhueleigbe Osemhantie Amos, PhD
The 2025 JAMB Policy Meeting has introduced not just new rules, but a new spirit — a deeper recalibration of what it means to succeed in Nigeria’s educational ecosystem. At a glance, the meeting was a policy briefing. In truth, it was a cultural reset, a quiet revolution. What we witnessed was the unveiling of a new academic ethic: “It is not enough to score high — you must outscore the rest.”
Prof. Ishaq Oloyede, the JAMB Registrar, made this clear with one sentence: “JAMB is not an achievement test; it is a ranking exam.” He further clarified: “A candidate with 370 may not even rank among the top 10, while another with 200 might fall below 500,000 nationally. That’s how competitive and relative admission has become” (JAMB 2025). With that, the measuring stick shifted. No longer does your score stand alone. Now, your score is only as valuable as how many people did better or worse than you. This is not a technical change — it is a philosophical realignment, reshaping merit from absolute excellence to comparative scarcity.
This is not the first time Nigeria has traveled this road. The shift evokes memories of the Udoji Civil Service Reforms of 1975, when performance-based assessments were introduced to inject merit into the public service. Then, as now, the intent was to reward excellence — but implementation quickly revealed cracks: systemic inequities, infrastructural deficiencies, and a political culture that often prioritizes connection over competence.
More deeply, this latest move is part of Nigeria’s colonial inheritance of educational selection as elite filtration. The British education model, imposed across Africa and Asia, used examinations to create a class of functionaries loyal to empire. Thomas Babington Macaulay’s blueprint in India — to raise an elite that was “Indian in blood, but English in intellect” — was administered through competitive exams designed to rank, exclude, and elevate. Nigeria imported this model wholesale. JAMB, in retooling itself as a ranking institution, is simply refining that colonial sieve.
But this refinement raises fresh challenges. In a country with immense inequality, where some students learn with tablets in private school labs while others learn with chalk on broken benches under leaking roofs, ranking becomes a codified form of privilege. The urban child in Lagos, plugged into mock CBT software, faces the same benchmark as the rural child in Edo with no electricity. The result? We call it merit. But it often smells like exclusion.
The data proves this. Most top scorers chose Mechanical Engineering at UNILAG. That’s not a mere coincidence; it is an index of educational monoculture, driven by social pressure and institutional branding. It mirrors what is observed in East Asian societies, especially South Korea and Japan, where hyper-competition has turned students into test-taking machines and schools into pressure cookers. These systems produce high scores, yes — but also soaring suicide rates, mental health crises, and an emotionally bankrupt generation.
Nigeria, thankfully, has not reached that point — but the psychological burden of rankings is real. A student who scores 300 may still rank in the bottom third. What does that do to their sense of self? In a culture where results define respect and family honour, we risk turning education into a cruel tournament where even success is not safe.
Meanwhile, JAMB’s introduction of strict admission timelines — two weeks for universities to accept JAMB-recommended students and four weeks for students to accept offers — appears modern, efficient, and digital. “All institutions must conclude admissions by October (for public) and December (for private) 2025. Any recommendation from CAPS not acted upon within two weeks shall be deemed lapsed, and any offer not accepted by the candidate within four weeks will be withdrawn,” JAMB announced (JAMB 2025). But in a nation where over 60% of students rely on cyber cafés, poor connectivity, or word-of-mouth, such time-bound processes may unwittingly become gatekeepers of inequality. The same system that ranks them may also shut the door before they can log in.
JAMB also declared: “Institutions must admit at least 90% of their quota on merit before exemptions or discretion can be considered. Merit must come first. That is now a policy and a rule.” This sounds noble — and perhaps even long overdue — but in practice, it raises concerns about what “merit” truly means in a fractured system. Without levelling the playing field, merit becomes another mask for inequality.
One might argue that the Federal Government has addressed access by opening more universities. Indeed, over 30 new federal, state, and private universities have been licensed in recent years. But these are often universities in name, not in capacity. Many lack functional libraries, equipped laboratories, qualified academic staff, or stable infrastructure. Some have no electricity. Others hold lectures in tents. Access without quality is deception. Paper expansion without learning transformation is hollow.
Painfully, most of those who make and enforce educational policies in Nigeria — their children do not pass through the system. They have travelled out of this country, and they know full well that no Nigerian university currently ranks among the top 100 universities in the world (as of the latest Times Higher Education and QS World University Rankings). Let it be said: Oxford is not an animal, Harvard is not a game, Stanford is not a street name, Cambridge is not a cartoon, MIT is not a mobile app, Princeton is not a perfume, Urbannia is not an eatery and Yale is not a fashion label. These are citadels of global excellence — centres of knowledge that combine history, innovation, funding, and academic freedom. Until Nigerian universities can invest in research, protect intellectual inquiry, and cultivate both skill and soul, we remain a country with certificates but no compass — celebrating enrolment while exporting ambition.
As if that is not bad enough, we now produce graduates who have degrees but cannot solve problems, who quote definitions but cannot construct arguments, who pass exams but cannot pass interviews. In a world where even viruses mutate faster than textbooks can be updated, paper qualifications are woefully inadequate. The global labour market demands competence, flexibility, collaboration, and creative thinking — none of which are guaranteed by a high JAMB score or even a university degree.
Compounding this is Nigeria’s dangerous obsession with the sciences — medicine, engineering, computer science — at the expense of the humanities, education, social sciences, and the arts. We have built a culture that celebrates the child admitted to study surgery but scoffs at the one choosing education. Yet, no society thrives on machines alone. Technology needs ethics. Medicine needs empathy. Engineering needs policy. Every advanced nation today — from Germany to the United States — recognizes the indispensable role of interdisciplinary thinking. Even Silicon Valley is powered not just by coders, but by liberal arts minds who shape user experience, storytelling, and ethical design.
In prioritizing the sciences to the exclusion of the soul, Nigeria risks producing a class of technically skilled but morally rudderless professionals — engineers who can build drones but cannot understand peace, doctors who know anatomy but cannot counsel grief, scientists who discover chemicals but ignore climate ethics.
Thus, the problem is not JAMB’s desire to innovate. Ranking can be useful. Timelines are necessary. Data-driven admission is fairer than opaque discretion. But in a fragile system, these reforms must come with deliberate equity measures. Infrastructure must be equalized across schools. Teachers must be trained. Digital access must be democratized. The arts must be respected. And the purpose of education must be rediscovered — not just as a path to jobs, but as a formation of character and conscience.
The 2025 JAMB Policy Meeting, then, must not be remembered simply as the year of national ranking slips and tightened admission protocols. It must be remembered as a call to reform the meaning of education itself. A reminder that ranking without equity is like speed without direction. A country can have a thousand universities and still produce confused graduates. It can rank its students with the precision of a Swiss watch and still fail to raise thinkers, visionaries, or leaders.
Let the rankings begin, yes — but let them be accompanied by reforms, compassion, and a national reflection on what it means to be educated in the 21st century. Nigeria cannot afford to raise a generation that is globally tested but locally irrelevant, academically ranked but ethically bankrupt, numerically qualified but spiritually lost.
We must remember: education is not just a path to success. It is the soul of a nation. And how we rank our students today is how history will rank our wisdom tomorrow.
Thanks for reading.
Comments are closed.